This is book 9 in the Ludovic Travers series and was given to me by my Secret Santa this Christmas. I had a rocky start with Bush when I first tried his work with The Case of the Platinum Blonde (1944), but thankfully things really improved with Dancing Death (1931), which is a Christmas country house mystery. Today’s read is another holiday mystery of sorts, with important events occurring in and around April Fool’s Day, as the title denotes.
Ludovic Travers, director of a publicity and consulting firm, has to negotiate a contract with stage producer Courtney Allard and Charles Crewe, who are wanting a lease on a theatre. Crewe has been getting death threats, but is not treating them seriously. Travers is invited down to Allard’s country abode to complete further discussions, but scraps of conversation he hears, make him worried he would be the butt of an April Fool’s joke when he goes down there. Yet instead a day into his visit he is confronted with a seemingly impossible double murder.
I would definitely say this is a howdunnit mystery as the mechanics, timings and chain of events involved in these crimes are quite complex. Travers and Chief Inspector Norris, (who work well as a sleuthing team), are quite fair in revealing what they know/revealing their sources of inspiration, so readers will be able to follow them as they progress through their case. There is a lot to intrigue and perplex readers in these crimes, including bizarre clues at the crime scene, (in a bedroom), such as a Dutch hoe. One slight niggle is that a very crucial piece of information is only found out at the very end of the book, a piece of information which gives the sleuths their final breakthrough and yet the only thing stopping them from getting this information sooner is one very recalcitrant suspect. I don’t know, perhaps this aspect of mystery writing affects people in different ways, but I think I prefer evidence to be more readily available, yet of course given in such a way that you smack your forehead at the end of the story, when you realise what you’ve missed.
The suspects in this story are mostly from a theatrical and American background, though there is also Allard’s sister, Sue, an absent chauffeur and the crime reporter for the Evening Record. The crimes occur very soon into the story so the reader does not get a chance to know the suspects until after the crime has been committed and Bush has quite a lot of fun with expected and unexpected false identities – which of course all help to keep you guessing about who is or are the guilty party. I particularly enjoyed the way the crimes are sprung upon us as well, as the suspense is keyed up to a high level, yet nothing happens, making you think everything is safe for the time being, only for death to strike suddenly and sharply, leaving two dead.
Favourite line of the book you ask? Definitely has to be when Travers is described as someone ‘who knew as little about women as ducks do about dumplings.’
Rating: 4.25/5
Just the Facts Ma’am (Gold Card): Timing of the Crime is Crucial
Tom Cat at Beneath the Stains of Time has also reviewed this book here.
I have never heard of an April Fool’s mystery before! Glad it was more enjoyable than the some of the other entries in the series you’ve read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Neither had I. Good time period for a murder though given the prank quality.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I definitely intend to get to a few Bush novels this year. Out of all of the reviews that I’ve read so far, The Case of the April Fools and Cut Throat sound like they’re the best, so I’ll probably start with one of those.
Bush has gotten a lot of attention with the reissues in the recent months, and his extensive back catalogue has led to claims that he may be a long lost classic author deserving a seat at the table with the big names. What’s your impression at this point? Good but not great?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have only read 3 so don’t feel I have read enough to make a thoroughly based opinion. I think I am preferring his earlier stuff more so far and I think like any prolific writer there are going to be a mixture of good and bad ones, so it really depends whether you are unlucky enough to land on the less good ones first. However my last two reads do seem to deserving-ness to come back into print.
LikeLike
The Dutch Hoe Mystery! I like it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Almost a pastiche of a Queen novel title.
LikeLike
Thanks for the review – I’ve a few Bush novels awaiting me on my metaphorical TBR pile, and so I’m glad that these novels sound like they would be right up my alley. 🙂 I see you’ll be reviewing Offord next – have you read ‘Smiling Tiger’?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No that is one of the ones I have not read yet. Have you? Would you recommend it?
LikeLike
Just read this one myself. Review very soon, but I think the best compliment I can pay it is that I really enjoyed it despite figuring it out/guessing it in about one third of the way through. I also had a wonky intro to Bush but he’s really growing on me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Look forward to reading your review when it appears. Impressed you cottoned on to the solution so quick – just passed me by. Was it a particular phrase or something which alerted you to it?
LikeLike
It just felt… familiar. I was a little off – I’ll DM you with more.
LikeLike
[…] Case of the April Fools has been reviewed at In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel, crossexaminingcrime, At the scene of the crime, gadetection and Beneath the Stains of Time among […]
LikeLike
[…] of Crime is Crucial: The Case of the April Fools (1933) by Christopher […]
LikeLike
[…] Even if the solution comes as no surprise to you, I still found the story clever and attractive.Kate @ CrossExaminingCrime: There is a lot to intrigue and perplex readers in these crimes, including bizarre clues at the […]
LikeLike