Murder by Matchlight (1945) by E. C. R. Lorac

With his dinner plans scuppered, Bruce Mallig is left wandering the streets of London during a blackout. Eventually he makes it to Regents Park, where his evening gets more dramatic when the sight of a match being struck reveals to him the face of a killer and his Irish victim, who is killed on a bridge, head bashed in. Mallig is not the only one in the vicinity, there is the matter of the nosey parker underneath the bridge and a doctor walking his dog. Are these three witnesses or is one of them a killer? Chief Inspector Macdonald’s investigation is made more difficult by the fact the victim was using a false name. There is also the matter of the various theatrical inhabitants of the victim’s accommodation. Living a wastrel life, the victim was forever cadging money off others and not above blackmail and black market racketeering, amongst other crimes. All the while WW2 is in full swing, with nightly raids making their presence strongly felt in the narrative.

Overall Thoughts

I think this novel would be pretty hard to review without mentioning the war. It is no mere backdrop, but is an integral part of the story, from the way the blackout effects eye witness testimony and the problems of tracking people’s past histories when some many buildings have been destroyed in the Blitz, to perhaps a very unique scene in the book in which Macdonald and his cohort end up having to conduct an interview whilst an air raid is going on. Questions interspersed between blasts soon have to be abandoned as saving lives becomes a more paramount point, not that Macdonald isn’t still thinking through the case.

Of course such a context brings certain questions to the surface, such as the arguable absurdity of solving the murder of one non-descript man, when there is some much more carnage going on during air raid attacks and on the battle field. This theme doesn’t overrun the narrative, but it enters into Macdonald’s conversations from time to time. Yet unlike in Marsh’s Death and the Dancing Footman, I think these moments and others hold a greater emotional resonance. Moreover the most emotional moments are often when characters say the least, such as when Macdonald is investigating the victim’s last known address and frequently he is talking to various locals, civil defence workers etc. working in amongst the latest mound of rumble. These short conversations of lost homes, spouses and limbs, may seem sweeping in their brevity, especially as Macdonald often merely replies with ‘I know.’ But I think the conciseness actually works the other way, with some things not needing to be said and perhaps Lorac’s contemporary readers may have felt the same way. It is definitely different reading this type of text long after the war has ended, yet even so I think readers today will find the war aspects of the book feel authentic.

The mechanics of the crime are quite interesting as initially everyone is quite perplexed that whilst one witness saw the face of the killer, no one heard their footsteps to the bridge. The answer to this query though is quite quickly resolved, but nevertheless unusual. Macdonald conducts a very methodical investigation, yet the way new characters and events crop up prevent this from becoming dry and stale. The motive and choice of culprit are very satisfying and the cluing for this one is strong, though of course I missed most of them!

This reprint also include the short story, ‘Permanent Policeman,’ (1953) which first appeared in MacKill’s Mystery Magazine. Given how short it is I don’t feel I can say anything about the plot, though fans of early 2000 chick flicks will spot an interesting connection between a certain film and this story. I’ll say no more over than to recommend Lorac’s entertaining and immersive novel.

Rating: 4.25/5

Source: Review Copy (British Library)


  1. Somehow I have three copies of this so I really ought to get around to reading it (or any Lorac tbh). This review does make it sound interesting as I am intrigued by those wartime details.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for the review. 😊 If I recall correctly, I wasn’t overly-impressed by this title. I think I read ‘Don’t Go out after Dark’ by Norman Berrow either immediately before or after ‘Murder by Matchlight’, and my responses to the novels were diametrically opposite. I enjoyed ‘Murder by Matchlight’ until the very end, and felt disappointed by the solution. In contrast, I didn’t enjoy ‘Don’t Go out after Dark’ much, and was uncertain as to where it was moving towards, but was pleased by its solution.

    Having read a few titles by Lorac, I seem to get along less well with her works – while her stories are interesting, I often find the mystery and the solution slightly wanting. 😔

    Liked by 2 people

      • *spoiler*

        It has been some time since I read the novel, and so I might be unfairly working off hazy memories.

        But I recall thinking that the solution was slightly obvious – since the culprit was already outside, and had left the table halfway through dinner. In fact, it felt like the detail of the culprit’s brief absence was dropped into the narrative in a way that made it quite obvious what was happened. 🤨

        I also seem to think that it was established – or at least hinted? – quite early on that the culprit could have been on some sort of contraption. And if the contraption allowed for fast movement, the brief absence from the dinner table would have allowed for the murder to take place. 🧐

        Finally, I seemed to think that other suspects weren’t especially convincing. It felt like anyone else could have done it since nobody had especially concrete alibis – except for the culprit who had a dinner companion, but was away for a few minutes. 🤓

        Ah, my memories feel quite confused. It was some time ago… 😅


        • I mustn’t have been paying as much attention (no surprise there), as I didn’t find the culprit’s identity as obvious as you. I don’t think I took in their alibi as much so I didn’t make the link you did.


  3. Apologies for being a month late and ten degrees off topic…but this seemed the best place to mention that I’ve just finished one of this author’s “Carol Carnac” novels, Copy for Crime, and I thought it was pretty good, overall.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.