The Mystery of the Hidden Room (1922) by Marion Harvey

I’m reading this as part of Past Offences’ Monthly Challenge, which has been a great thing to be a part of as it means I’ve come across and read books which otherwise I might have overlooked and Marion Harvey’s The Mystery of the Hidden Room (1922) is one of them. This is a short but action packed novella beginning with the narrator, Carlton Davies being summoned to his married, ex-fiancée’s house late at night. In these initial opening pages it turns out that Ruth, only married another man named Philip Darwin, (which in a way is rather an apt surname for him) so he wouldn’t inform the police about the fact he saw her brother, Dick shoot another man in a gambling den. On reaching Ruth’s house her reason for calling him is slowly revealed, as initially it seems like she’s just a bit depressed. However it turns out that Darwin is planning to ruin Davies after his creepy secretary Orton shows him a torn up letter from Ruth to Davies who she still loves. Things get a lot worse though when Ruth goes to Darwin’s study to retrieve her letter… The clocks strike midnight… a gunshot is heard and when Davies and Orton enter the room they see Darwin’s dead body, a half finished new and Ruth holding a gun in her hand…

Rather disappointing cover, which doesn't actually fit with the story inside...
Rather disappointing cover, which doesn’t actually fit with the story inside…

Although at the inquest a few anomalies are brought to light such as the doctors disagreeing over the time of death, Darwin having a mysterious meeting with an unknown person prior to his death, the fact no one admits to knowing the woman named as sole legatee of Darwin’s new incomplete will and a handkerchief and jewel-less ring being found at the scene, the minds of the jurors are quickly made up and bring in a verdict against Ruth who is arrested. Despite other people such as Darwin’s suspicious nephew Lee, having a possible motive for killing him, due to the study windows being locked from the inside and Orton and Davies seeing no one leave through the study door, it is hard to show how anyone but Ruth could have done it. But Davies is convinced she is innocent and at the suggestion of his servant, Jenkins, he asks for the help of McKelvie who is:

‘a slender, well-dressed young… refined and cultured man, extremely clever, if eccentric, whose main idiosyncrasies seemed to be confined to a whole-souled worship of Sherlock Holmes, a decidedly autocratic manner, and a fondness for speaking satirically, even at the expense of his friends.’

He is also very good at solving crimes and in the puzzle clue sort of tradition he even presents Davies and therefore the reader with 15 questions which if answered correctly will lead to the solution of the murder. McKelvie’s investigations bring up lots of new information, one point of which is indicated in the title of the novel and consequently widens in some respects the net of suspects. But despite this it seems touch and go whether or not McKelvie and Davies will find hard evidence of Ruth’s innocence and it doesn’t help that people involved in the case have a habit of disappearing, some more permanently than others…

With two confrontation scenes, the former of which having Sherlock Holmes like dramatic qualities, the mystery surrounding this murder case is full of surprises and last minute twists, which only someone on the same level as Holmes himself could have foreseen. Although despite it being very clever I did feel the solution was a bit overdone as part of me was quite frankly amazed that the killer did not need to write each stage of their murder plot down to check they didn’t forget anything, it was that complex and complicated. Furthermore, I feel this was the sort of plot Father Ronald Knox had in mind when he wrote his Decalogue of rules for writing detective fiction in 1928, as this story definitely broke 3 of these rules.

A minor point I want to make concerns the servant, Jenkins, who not only introduces Davies to McKelvic but he also works for him in his spare time. Moreover, it seems McKelvie saved Jenkins’ life in WW1 and that in a past life Jenkins was actually a safe breaker, a past which is now behind him and such skills are only used to help McKelvic. These little details really reminded me a bit of Lord Peter Wimsey and Bunter’s relationship, as well Albert Campion’s sidekick Lugg, who also had a criminal past.

I think this book would be most enjoyed by those who like detective novels transitioning from Victorian into Golden Age detective fiction and readers who love very puzzling crimes and this one in its elaborateness did make me think of John Dickson Carr a little.

Typographical Niggle: The print in this book was ridiculously small, which did reduce the enjoyment of the reading experience a bit, so if you plan to get this book don’t get the edition shown in the picture featured in this post. Alternatively there might be a good at version on the Project Gutenberg site.

Rating: 3.5

See also:


  1. It’s extremely hard to judge how serious Knox was about the decalogue, isn’t it? I want to believe that it’s at least 50% tongue-in-cheek and he’s almost spoofing the idea of the detective novel having to have ‘rules’, but I don’t quite see the joke. The rest of me thinks that some of his points are very valid (only some of them, mind…not sure I understand his aversion to Chinamen!) and the couple of Knox books I’ve read have been so frightfully stultifying that I can easily see him sitting down to spell out in dishwater-dull prose What Is To Be Expected From Now On. I’ve just read a wonderful book that smashes two of his rules and probably bends a third to a painful degree…but it was an absolutely wonderful read. Horses, courses, I know, but I still want to know how serious he was being…

    Anyway, this sounds like a fun read, thank-you for flagging it up. It goes on the dautingly-vast list of Book I Will Get Round To, I Will, I Will, I Will…

    Liked by 1 person

    • To get more time for reading you’ll have to pretend you’ve been kidnapped or something. Though the fact your entire TBR pile has gone as well as your self might make people a bit suspicious… Yeah I think your right in suggesting Knox’s rules are partially fun and partially serious, as I think for some of these rules breaking them does ruin the book a bit such as the killer coming out of nowhere right at the end of the book. Never actually read one of Knox’s own detective stories, but not so sure I want to now if they’re as exciting as you are suggesting. As to the Chinaman rule I think the main rule of thought on it is that he was referring to Sax Rohmer type books where the baddie is always a Chinese person and therefore Knox might have considered it an overused plot device.


  2. I’ve read many of Harvey’s mysteries. My favorite of the lot so far is THE VENGEANCE OF THE IVORY SKULL only because it takes place for the most part in South America of the 1920s (Brazil, I think). The detective’s name is Graydon McKelvie. His last name ends in an E not a C. Your version was clearly a poorly done OCR digital transfer from some fly-by-night POD printer. All my copies are vintage US editions (Harvey was an American writer) and are very easy to read.

    Harvey was an American pulp writer and a man, not a woman as most people think. Marion spelled with an O is a male name. Although it is also a variant for the more commonly found Marian which is the usual spelling when the name is a woman’s. My mother was named Marion and she and her mother, who she was named after, both spelled it with an O. But more often than not Marion with an O is a man.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I shall have to look out for The Vengeance of the Ivory Skill and thanks for letting me know about McKelvie. I definitely think my edition was a poor version as it did have the name written as McKelvic. I didn’t know vintage US did this particular author but I think I will look for their editions when I next buy this author. Also thanks for letting me that Harvey was a man as I do admit in my head I was kinda thinking the name was woman’s because it was similar to Marian.


  3. A short novella, really?

    I read the edition published by Jovian Press recently which had 322 pages, even though the print is relatively large.

    I sort of enjoyed the first half, but then the plot became more of an adventure thriller.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.