Someone from the Past (1958) by Margot Bennett

The Man Who Did Not Fly (1955), which was reprinted by the British Library earlier this year, has been one of my reading highlights. Naturally I then scoured the internet for other books by Bennett and today’s reads is one of the titles I managed to track down.

My copy is the Eyre & Spottiswoode edition and I really like the opening paragraph of the blurb it gives:

The lives of some people are a preparation for murder. Sarah didn’t know she was one of these. She planned to marry, and to live respectably ever after. The past was to slip into the obliging obscurities of time. Then one morning someone from the past returned and shot her dead.

I have decided not to include the remainder of their blurb synopsis as I felt it mapped out the trajectory of the book a little too well, even if it does not give away spoilers as such. In terms of suspects we have four men from Sarah’s past. They include a former husband, her first (and is it true?) her only real love, and two other beaus which were burnt by their time with her.

Overall Thoughts

In keeping with her earlier work Bennett delivers another character driven novel. This time our primary focus is on Nancy. She had known Sarah for 6 years, having even shared a flat with her for a while. There romantic interests and acquaintances heavily overlap, with Nancy’s romantic possibilities being extinguished by the more dazzling Sarah. The night before Sarah dies, she bumps into Nancy and reveals that she has been receiving threatening letters from one of the four men in her past. She wants Nancy to figure out which one it is. Nancy does in fact eventually manage this, but not until it is far too late to help Sarah. This is no ordinary sleuthing role and Sarah’s news and death significantly impact Nancy’s own love life and even personal safety, as it is with one of these four, she has been getting close to lately.

Nancy is the narrator and whilst she is very much up to her neck in trouble and is at the heart of the mystery the novel relates, she is more of an accidental rather than an amateur sleuth. Her initial priorities are not to uncover the murderer’s identity and her alternative aim, once acted upon, thoroughly gets her into a tight corner. She is not the wisest of individuals, yet Bennett’s characterisation of her, does not place her comfortably within the heroine in jeopardy category.

The back story to Sarah’s death and the four men she was involved with is expertly woven into the text. I did fear I would have a long info dump to work my way through, but the author avoids this structural choice and instead we get snippets here and there which build up a highly nuanced and interesting picture. There is Sarah’s impoverished background and her desire to improve herself, coupled with her tendency to drop and pick people up on a whim. Yet she is not the stereotypical maneater you can find in fiction and I feel Bennett makes a point of revealing how the men, however wronged they might be, are not saints either.

This is not a traditional example of a mystery with a closed set of suspects, yet I would argue that is retains such a trope nevertheless. The focus really is on the four men and Nancy and Bennett is very good at making you wonder which one did it. She does not close off any options too soon and those that seemed closed are reopened upon new information. It is not safe as a reader to discount any one of them.

When I describe a book as character driven I wonder whether some readers immediately write the mystery off, as the phrase character driven is frequently combined with the notion of there being no puzzle. In some cases this is probably true, yet Bennett’s books so far do not seem to fit this pattern. It is easy to read the book and think there is no puzzle, that there is nothing for the reader to pick up on and analyse for the glimmers of a solution. The relationships are very much at the forefront and the author does not deliver an upfront puzzle mystery in which we follow the steps of an earnest sleuth. Yet as I reached the end of this book and reflected upon it afterwards, I realised how much Bennett does give in the way of clues. There are several highly significant clues which are the type that make you want to have a face palm moment for having missed them. Once you see them they appear so glaringly obvious, yet perhaps because they are not stereotypical clues such as footprints, they are more easy to miss or overlook.

Whilst I don’t think this book as quite as good as The Man Who Did Not Fly, I still very much enjoyed it and I am looking forward to trying more by Bennett.

Rating: 4.25/5


  1. I’ve been holding off reading TMWDF, but that won’t last for much longer, and now you tell me Bennett has more out there that are a must read?! I’ll be doing a Book Finder search as soon as I’m done here.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Coincidentally, I tried reading Someone from the Past a few days ago, having enjoyed The Man Who Didn’t Fly. “Character driven” can be a quality that makes or breaks a novel for this reader, and in this case I was turned off quite quickly: I found both Sarah and Donald off-puttingly dislikeable, and Nancy’s situation just made me sad. I didn’t see anyone amusingly witty or quirky in the picture, and I didn’t stick around on the off chance that this would change. But I do hope to try some of the other Bennetts, when I can get my hands on them. (This happened to be the easiest one to get from the libraries, after TMWDF.)

    Liked by 1 person

    • I had a similar reaction to This Way Out by James Ronald – at the time of reading I wasn’t in a place to respond to the characters and emotions of the piece well. So I understand what you mean.
      I think as Bennett’s book progresses you can see what she is doing with her characters and people such as Donald, are not necessarily meant to be liked. Nancy does get herself in a bit of a pickle to say the least, but I would say it is not unredeemable.
      But I know what you mean about lacking witty and quirky characters.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I didn’t know you had reviewed this. But then again I wasn’t really reading the blogs very much in the last six months of last year. I like what you picked up on in the story, much of that went over my head. I was homing in on the coverup portion of the plot and was hoping that would displace the backstories of Sarah’s men. I do try to give a book a chance to be what it is, however, like Jeremy’s reactions above I grew impatient with some the characters. Guess he didn’t stick around long enough to meet Mike. Wonder what he would have made of him? Definitely the least likable person in this relatively small cast.

    Looking forward to my read of The Widow of Bath. She made a lot of money with that one! So I’m hoping it’s her best book.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Yes it’s funny how one cast of characters can gel well with a reader and another does not. It doesn’t seem to correlate with how nice or nasty the characters are either. Well at least that is what I have found in my experience. But it does make all the difference in a character driven novel.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.