The Sentence is Death (2018) by Anthony Horowitz

I have been eagerly anticipating this follow up to The Word is Murder (2017) for quite a while, having thoroughly enjoyed the first novel in this out of the ordinary new series. Out of the ordinary you say? Well it is not every day that an author puts himself into the plot, not just as a cameo, but as a Watson narrator for a co-protagonist, who is an ex-policeman, now Private Investigator called Daniel Hawthorne. Indeed Horowitz, the character, is not being propelled into an unfamiliar world or time period, but instead is very much kept within his normal life with Hawthorne intruding upon it. Furthermore the familiar blue print for the social misfit detective is equally not wholly adhered to, with Hawthorne becoming a far more problematic and interesting character.

However before I plunge into the review more fully for the sake of ease when I refer to Horowitz I am referring to the character and when I say the author or writer I am referring to well… It’ll be interesting to see how well I remember to stick to this system.

A difficult morning of filming for the 7th series of Foyle’s War is made even worse for Horowitz, by a modern day taxi entering the shot and of course we can guess who is inside the cab… Nonplussed by ruining the take, Daniel Hawthorne, proceeds to tell Horowitz about a new case Hawthorne has been employed by the police to advise on a.k.a. solve. The previous night Richard Pryce, a successful divorce lawyer for the wealthy, was murdered in his Hampstead set home. This is a case of death by wine bottle, though not by drinking the contents. Attention is immediately given to the last divorce proceedings Pryce had been working on, given the thematic aptness of threat he had received from the wife in the case, a feminist writer, last week. There is also the unusual clue of the number painted on the wall: 182. Hawthorne is his usual recalcitrant self, still refusing to open up, yet he is a walk in the park in comparison to their police counterparts, who seem to emulate the criminals they arrest more than they should. Other deaths past and present widen the case, yet Horowitz still cherishes the dream of solving the case before everyone else. Is he in with a chance or is it a mere pipe dream?

Overall Thoughts

When it comes to partnerships such as Holmes and Watson, Poirot and Hastings and Wolfe and Goodwin, the focus and the attention is decidedly on the great sleuths themselves. Yet I found this not to be the case in this book. If anything I felt Horowitz’s wrangling and resistance towards his role as a Watson narrator to be a main strand of novel, with Horowitz still trying to come to terms with role he has in his partnership with Hawthorne. We definitely have some overt irony when for instance Horowitz writes that: ‘I like to be in control of my books. I had no wish to turn myself into a character, and a secondary one at that: the perennial sidekick.’ I equally loved the line where Hawthorne says to him that: ‘you write stuff down without even realising its significance. You’re a bit like a travel writer who doesn’t know quite where he is.’ I really liked this way of looking at a Watson narrator, even if it is not very complimentary! Yet for all this, Horowitz is a Watson narrator who is self-conscious of his failings when it comes to sleuthing and therefore finds the position as Watson all the more galling. I find this tension paramount to the text as a whole.

Like with his Watson role, Horowitz also has a love hate relationship with the sleuth he is biographing for, with emphasis much more on the dislike than the like, especially when it seems that Hawthorne is happy to cross Horowitz’s boundaries, but ensures Horowitz cannot do likewise. We do get to see a more personal/friendlier side to Hawthorne though only for a very brief glimmer. With this and other moments of vulnerability a crack of light is beginning to emerge on the character of Hawthorne and I have a few ideas as to the mystery surrounding him.

At times I think Horowitz and Hawthorne are perhaps more similar than they think, as through their respective professions, private investigator and writer, they both have the trait of assessing and judging others. Now Hawthorne often puts his foot in it by expressing this judgement in an inappropriate way, yet I found at times that Horowitz too exhibited a certain judging tendency. The big difference is, is that he voices it in a more socially acceptable way. Though I think each of these characters probably has a difference focus when it comes to their judging. For Horowitz there is a partial leaning towards women, as looking at his approach to describing and assessing the suspects there is a gendered difference. It didn’t particularly bug me but it was still a strong impression that I got. Now the suspects in general are a fairly unpleasant bunch, but I would say that the unpleasantness of the female characters is written with a greater intensity. The two most successful women professionally are the most criticised and it just so happens that those two are the ones who treat Horowitz with the most indifference, which with their lack of personal manners probably balances things up. The gendered difference is most palpable when you compare the scenes featuring the interviews Horowitz and Hawthorne have with the ex-couple from the case Pryde just concluded. Both of them begin as suspects who see themselves as superior and both of course have their fall later in the book, yet I just found that a lot more relish went into breaking the woman down, as though Horowitz needed that moment to reclaim the position of superiority and power, (as shown in his new ability to feel pity for the woman). Male characters can be unpleasant but any commentary on this unpleasantness is much less extensive or qualified by remarks suggesting a feeling of liking them in spite of the negatives.

By situating the story within his normal life the writer gets to indulge in sharing milieus or settings which he knows a lot about and has a lot invested in. A key instance of this is the behind the scenes look at the making of TV productions and boy did I not realise how much effort it takes to shoot 30 seconds of film! The writer also has a lot of fun, (which he passes on to the reader), with various mystery/thriller clichés such as chase scenes, as well as references to Sherlock Holmes. Hawthorne at the start of the book unleashes a series of deductions about Horowitz, yet I liked how this familiar event is inverted in some interesting ways such as Horowitz’s reaction being one of exasperation not amazement. There is also another scene later on the book involving The Study in Scarlet, which I loved but I’ll let you find out how great it is for yourselves.

I am seen as a blogger who spends a lot of time talking about the characters in books and I am sure this review has been a case in point. Yet I do want to change tracks and look at the plot, which does not suffer or get marginalised due to the captivating character development. The case opens up with additional deaths, but I enjoyed how Horowitz uses these deaths to bring a refreshingly clever solution to the initial murder, as the relationship between them is not entirely straight forward. Hawthorne has it right when you have to find the shape of the crime. As in the Holmes stories the reader will be ahead of Horowitz in many respects, anticipating some developments that he does not, but I don’t think many readers will be a pace with Hawthorne. The culprit is surprising, yet it did not feel like a cheat, as Hawthorne carefully outlines all the things Horowitz and the reader overlooked. I’m surprised I am not bruised for kicking myself so much! There is one clue where I did nearly shout out ‘arghhh.’ No detail is too small for this solution! All of the pieces of the solution dovetail beautifully, though this is to be expected from the writer, who has a definite strength in this area, as is his ability to craft very clever and sneaky linguistic clues. So you certainly need to keep your wits about you when reading this book!

So another enthralling instalment in the series, as I did race through this one fairly rapidly and I am interested to see where the writer takes the series next, as this is a book which not only gets you thinking, in terms of solving the puzzle set, but also has you pondering a lot about the characters themselves, as he provides his readers with two very well layered protagonists. Thankfully for those of you eager to get your hands on this book, you won’t have long to wait as it is being released on the 1st November.

Rating: 4.5/5

On a final note I have also been enjoying the linking titles in this series and I’m hoping it’s not just me who wonders whether future book titles will go the whole hog and progress from word and sentence to say paragraph, page, chapter etc.

No, just me?

See also:

Magpie Murders (2016)


  1. “However before I plunge into the review more fully for the sake of ease when I refer to Horowitz I am referring to the character and when I say the author or writer I am referring to well… It’ll be interesting to see how well I remember to stick to this system.

    Since you’ll probably review the next entry in this series and will face the same problem again, I submit to your attention the system devised by French critic Michel Lebrun to discuss the works of Ellery Queen. He called the character Ellery (as he is referred to in the novels in fact) and the author Queen. Should work well with Mr. Horowitz’s brand of autofictive crime fiction. 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

    • Good tip Xavier! Have you read any of Horowitz’s more metafictional work (Magpie Murders, Word is Murder etc)? Definitely think your literary theory sort of brain would probably have something far more intelligent it say about it than I can manage.
      Also the link you have added doesn’t seem to work.


      • I have trouble doing clickable words on WordPress but I don’t despair – someday I’ll be able to figure it out!

        Here is the link, hopefully working this time:

        I have both Magpie and Word on my shelves but haven’t gotten to read them yet – I don’t pick books, books pick me – but I indeed find his approach exciting and definitely up my alley. Don’t know whether I would be able to add something interesting to what’s already been said about his work, but don’t worry you’re doing just fine. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I kind of skimmed your review, Kate, as the book is winging its way across the ocean as I type this and I don’t want to spoil things. But it looks like I’m about to have a thrilling follow-up to my last Horowitz read. And yes, I too have been wondering about the title progression, especially if he’s planning ten or so of these!

    Liked by 1 person

    • haha yes well if he is planning on 10 then the word progression could end up with phrases such as book case or library!
      Hope you enjoy this one and I look forward to reading your thoughts as I feel like mine got a bit tangled. Sure yours will be much more erudite!


      • I can exclusively reveal that the remaining 8 books in this series will all be titled — with increasing desperation — in the American Cozy tradition wherein they all tie in to elements of writing and publishing with puns that become harder and harder to defend. The ensuing titles will be:

        3. Chapter and Hearse
        4. By Book or By Crook
        5. Twist of Death (US title: Death Twist)
        6. The Bobby in the Library (US title: Haw-Thorne in My Side)
        7. The Amateur Die-tective (US title: Paperback Die-ter)
        8. A Stab in the Bookmark
        9. Series-al Killer
        10. Dead End

        I’m in breach of contract revealing these — fourteen of us have been locked up for months hothousing suggestion –but since it’s in the public interest an’ all…

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Very uch looking forward to this one, so I like Bradley have given the above only a guilty skim. Horowitz implied on Twitter that he was potentiallty going to write an impossible murder before too long — is there any sign of that here? Apologies if you mention it above, I really did just fly through your review with one eye closed and ther other pretending not to look…

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I so enjoyed THE WORD IS MURDER that I’m going to buy a UK edition of this book; I can’t wait an entire year for the US edition to show up in the Chicago library system. Daniel Hawthorne is a breath of fresh air and he’s set miles apart from the usual cookie cutter style damaged policemen characters we get from contemporary writers these days.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Great to hear that this is another strong entry into the Horowitz mystery canon. 😁 I only skim-read the review, and will return back once I finish reading the novel. 🧐 Not sure if I should aim to grab it on my Kindle, or await for its appearance in my local library…

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Like you, it seems, I really enjoyed this witty and cleverly-constructed book. However for all of the cunning plot lines, was it just me who was frustrated by an apparent error in the early chapters?

    Hawthorne correctly deduces that ‘Tony’ has lost his mobile phone (p 14). The pair then go straight to Heron’s Wake by taxi where, inexplicably, Tony has his phone in his pocket (p 44). I know how pedantic this sounds but in a novel where the reader is led to believe that every detail is crucial this is disappointing, don’t you think? How did this get past the proofreaders? Or is it me who is missing something?

    Great book though.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I have to be honest I didn’t notice that! Not sure every reader is as beady eyed as yourself. Since it makes little difference to the plot I don’t feel particularly disappointed, but then again everyone approaches reading differently.

      Liked by 1 person

    • When Anthony takes out his phone at Heron’s Wake, he states clearly that he had picked up the phone from his flat on the way over and that Hawthone had been right about that.
      Now what had Hawthone said which was right ?
      He had said,”The chances are it’s on silent and you’ll find it somewhere at home.’
      When Anthony had left for the sets in the morning, he had overslept and left in a hurry and hence could not search properly.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.