The Pavilion (1946) by Hilda Lawrence

Lawrence is an author I only came across for the first time last year, but I have returned to her work quite a bit, with mixed reading results. However she did not write much mystery fiction so I have rapidly got to my penultimate Lawrence read, which is today’s review. The only other one I have not read is A Time To Die (1945). I know some readers don’t enjoy reading a lot of one author too close together, but I sometimes find it helpful, as I can remember more easily the previous reads and decide how the writing might be changing – for better or for worse. Out of what I have read, her first novel, Blood Upon the Snow (1944) is my favourite and is the one I would recommend people trying first.

This story starts with a journey, with various people making their way to the home of Hurst Herald, though the character we focus on, in particular, is Regan Carr. She has been invited their by Hurst to come and stay, since her mother has died. However on arrival no one seems to have been aware she was coming and more importantly Regan is too late; Hurst had died the night before due to his heart. This of course leaves Regan in a very awkward position with Hurst’s wife and in-laws, as well as Hurst’s two brothers. Everyone, barring the housekeeper are polite, but underneath Regan is quick to see that in the case of May, Hurst’s widow, this kindness is only skin deep and she is also quick to see the bitterness and tensions within the household: between Hurst’s blood relatives and his married ones.

With such an atmosphere you know something bad is bound to happen. But when? And what will this bad thing turn out to be? That is the focus of the rest of the book. Fray, one of Hurst’s brothers, gets Regan involved in going through all of Hurst’s diaries and papers and it eventually transpires that Fray is wanting Regan to remember something from her last time at the house when she was 6. Something terrible, terrible enough that Hurst might have given his life for it. The crimes of this book are definitely those of the past. Yet all of this unfolds over a number of days with Regan having to contend with the various difficult and bizarre householders. The pavilion, as mentioned in the title, is an eerie and sinister figure in the background of the book, with its own story to tell. But will Regan be able to remember the information which will unlock the mystery? And will she remember before someone prevents her from doing so permanently?

Overall Thoughts

As I said earlier, I have had a mixed experience with my Lawrence reading and unfortunately this is not one of the better ones. Having read quite a few now I think this is because Lawrence tried out a lot of different narrative types, even if they all have a domestic suspense leaning, and as a consequence this experimenting didn’t lead to success every time. Yet because her output was so small this somewhat skewers the quality of her body of work overall. Perhaps if she had been as prolific as Christie or even Sayers she might have had her experiments and then begun to hit her stride, as she does have a number of writing strengths.

One such strength is her ability to create an atmosphere, even from the smallest of phrases. She does not have to over ladle adjectives in order to put a chill down your spine.  I also like her handling of narrative perspective, as in this book we view the Hurst household initially from the viewpoint of the servants, which is quite revealing. She is also a dab hand at creating an interesting character. May, our family matriarch, is a very intricate and complex personality. She is adept at being obstructive whilst being outwardly considerate and the reader will spend a lot of the book trying to decide how much of a baddy she is. Then again I have always felt that Lawrence is strong at writing female characters and at using her writing to subtly consider the plight of women at the time – financially and socially. This is most strongly revealed in Death of a Doll (1947), which is set within an all-women’s hostel, but it is also present in this work. Without a nest egg or a financially secure family, women are shown to be in a precarious state, whether they are a young orphan like Regan or like two of the Hurst servants, who are two elderly servants in their 60s, but who have to pretend they are much younger in order to get work which puts a roof over their head, a roof they are always fearful will be taken away from them. Interestingly whilst the reader might feel sympathy for these two sisters in particular, this vulnerability is not necessarily treated with much sympathy by the other more secure characters.

I think people looking for a conventional mystery will be disappointed with this book, after all the deaths in this book all take place off page. The pace is fairly slow, which may be in keeping with the nature of the plot and even be more naturalistic, but eventually it becomes hard to maintain interest, the pace is that slow. There are a lot of good elements in this plot but they do become submerged beneath the padding and slow pace. Furthermore, although I have said Lawrence is good at writing female characters, Regan is the exception, as she increasingly lacks presence. Fray becomes the driving force of the book, keeping his thoughts to himself, whilst Regan becomes fainter and fainter in the story, being in the middle of things but making much less impression. The ending, with the final showdown between Fray and an unnamed other person, is well-crafted though. The culprit is not identified by name but as the narrative reveals each piece of the solution, the name becomes more inferable until it is confirmed by the person who does not come into dinner. This is a moving way to end a book, but unfortunately my interest levels had somewhat dissipated so I didn’t get as much from it.  So overall I am a little frustrated with this story. There is a really good story in there but it just doesn’t seem to manage to make its way out to the reader.

Rating: 3.25/5

Just the Facts Ma’am (Gold Card): Published under more than one title

See also:

Duet of Death (1949)


  1. Sorry this one didn’t work for you. I do agree though that it can be useful to consider a whole body of work while it is still fresh in your mind and I can see your point about how her relatively small body of work may make it hard to infer how she might have developed with more stories to her name.

    Hopefully this means that you are saving the best Lawrence for last…

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for the review – as I suspect I won’t be picking up this one anytime soon. >_< Am I right in thinking you received 'Death of a Doll' for Christmas? Hopefully that would turn out to be a much stronger read. I'm looking forward to your upcoming review, but I'm sad to say that my local Kindle store seems to have withdrawn all of Gilbert's works. So I suspect I would be frustrated if the next review emerges with a top score!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Received DOAD for my birthday and have already reviewed it on my blog. That was a stronger read, but had some issues of its own – i.e. having extraneous sleuths and poorer pacing in the final third of the book. Sad to hear all the Gilbert books have gone off Kindle. Hopefully have a review of the book ready soon.


  3. Greetings. Just finished this book and had to run to the Web to see what others have said about it. There are quite a few really good reviews on Goodreads, but it’s your review that I agree with, almost to the letter. I love a good Gothic, but upon finishing this book I thought, “I just didn’t enjoy reading it.” I didn’t skim, but nor did I feel that delicious desire to keep turning the pages. Regan is not a heroine; she’s a non-entity. And certain devices rang so absolutely false, such as Regan not opening Miss Etta’s gift immediately. The parceling out of the diary entries was maddening — Any hero(ine) worth his or her salt would have said, “No, I’m not waiting until tomorrow to hear the next revealing entry. I’m reading it now.” The motives are poor, or at least poorly explained. I think I was expecting a mixture of Flannery O’Connor and Shirley Jackson, and in that expectation I was disappointed. I want to say that I think Lawrence could write–if a bit ponderously–but I felt almost no suspense, possibly because there never seemed to be a threat against Regan. I grew up with Victoria Holt, and she really knew how to build suspense, even with her naive protagonists. So, overall, I give this one a big “Meh,” and suggest that it has not held up to the test of time.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for taking the time to visit the blog. It’s always a relief when you’re not the only one who didn’t love a book! I find Lawrence’s books have a number of good qualities, but that often these qualities are marred by much bigger weaknesses looming over the top of them. The Blood Upon the Snow is my favourite by her, though the recently reprinted Death of a Doll has garnered a good reception. Again with the latter there were a number of elements I enjoyed and the milieu is a good one, but it is definitely a case of too many cooks spoil the broth, when it comes to the number of sleuths involved.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.