Suddenly at His Residence (1947) by Christianna Brand

So this week there is not just one review from Christianna Brand’s work, but two! This one is the classic country house murder mystery, set during World War 2. We are even given a family tree and told that out of the 10 people mentioned, 2 will die at the hands of one of the others. But which one will it be?

As you would expect there is the dictator like patriarch, Sir Richard March, and every year the anniversary of his first wife’s death is commemorated, with his four grown up grandchildren, Petra, Claire and Philip and Edward playing key parts in the event. It should be mentioned that the first three of these grandchildren all came from his children from his first wife (now all dead or moved far away), whereas Edward descended from the daughter Richard had with his second wife, who had also been his mistress whilst his first wife was still around. To round out the family gathering there is Philip’s wife Ellen and their baby daughter Antonia, though their marriage is far from strong given that Philip is openly in love with Claire.

Unsurprisingly Richard’s elder grandchildren annoy him so much during the occasion that he threatens to disinherit them and leave his property and money to his second wife, Bella and then on to Edward. Thoroughly disgruntled he goes to stay in the lodge alone that night. The lodge is surrounded by dense rose bushes and has one sand path. It is the lodge his first wife died in and has become a shrine ever since. He spends his time writing a new will. Yet the next morning he is found dead and the new will he was supposed to have been writing has disappeared. Foul play is soon cried when Philip, a doctor, finds his medical bag has been rifled, with Richard’s medicine and a phial of strychnine gone missing. Enter Inspector Cockerill…

Suspects of course abound. Philip and Claire come under suspicion being the first ones on the scene and the money they would have got from the old will could have meant Philip could afford to divorce Ellen. There is also Edward. When he was a child his parents were drowned. Though he says he saw this happen, he never did. But that did not stop him from using the incident to manipulate those around him and to avoid doing anything he didn’t want to do. In the opening pages he is described in the following way:

‘In time, banishment from home had become an impossibility for the darling little psychopath, and even Edward himself could no longer distinguish between his real and his self-induced manifestations of abnormality.’

Recently a new alienist has suggested he could enter fugues or periods of automatism. Initially he loved hearing this, as it was another way to gain attention. But now murder has struck he is far from sanguine and also the likeliest subject in the eyes of others. After all what if he had committed the murder whilst in a fugue?

Overall Thoughts

For those who like locked room or impossible crimes I think this story definitely counts as such, as the lodge within which Richard is found could only be accessed by the path and the path had been smoothed down late last night by the gardener in such a way no one else could have done it afterwards. The only footprints are those from the characters which found him in the morning. This aspect was certainly intriguing, though it felt as though it was the suspects who spent more time pondering solutions than Inspector Cockerill did. I wouldn’t say the solution is ingenuous to this locked room mystery, but within the context of the story it fits very well in a way an overly belaboured solution wouldn’t have.

Image result for suddenly at his residence christianna brand

One of the strengths of this book was how Brand used a familiar setup but was also able to create a number of unexpected surprises, such as at the inquest. The ending though holds Brand’s greatest surprises and I think it would certainly feature on any list of crime fiction’s most dramatic endings. The opening of the novel is also somewhat of a surprise, with Edward at another session with a psychoanalyst. Yet I think it was an opening which worked very well, as it sets up a number of expectations concerning this character, none of which are hugely positive. However I was surprised by how Edward as a character turns away from these expectations as the story progressed and in some ways for me he became the most interesting character of the book.

This read also meant a return to Brand’s serial sleuth Inspector Cockerill. His complex character although sparsely commented on, unfolded as the tale developed. Our first description of Cockerill is that he was a:

‘Small, brown and bright-eyed, a dusty little old sparrow arrayed in a startling clean white panama hat, he was soon, sparrow-like, at the centre of all interest and activity, hopping and darting this way and that, in search of crumbs of information.’

However once his investigation into Richard’s murder is firmly underway and he is using his favoured detecting technique of causing suspects to argue with one another to see who slips up, he is described much more darkly: ‘Cockerill darted to and fro like an evil spirit, throwing fresh fuel to the flames.’ With such an interesting sleuth it is therefore a big shame that Cockerill is very much in the shadows in this story, with the suspects’ discussions of the case taking up much more of the narrative space than Cockerill’s own actions. Moreover, his strong desire for the criminal to confess before they are revealed and then arrested, in order that they may save their souls, just came out of nowhere for me. This more personal and emotional sleuth didn’t really match how Cockerill appears before this point.

Nevertheless when it comes to the suspects, Brand’s character psychology is well-crafted, Image result for suddenly at his residence christianna brandwith relationships being complex and life like, avoiding melodramatic pitfalls, and in particular Brand deftly captures the sudden reversals of feelings the suspects have towards each other. I enjoyed the moments we could see what the characters were thinking, as such instances were more often than not done for a specific reason, rather than merely filling space, such as during the inquest when the jurymen’s thoughts are examined.

Whilst this is not a perfect mystery, after all I am not entirely sure the reader could deduce the guilty suspect, this story does have a lot to offer and will happily occupy a rainy afternoon, as it did for me today. Equally if you want to read a country house mystery with a highly unusually ending this is the one to go for in my opinion.

Rating: 4.25/5

Vintage Mystery Scavenger Hunt Item: Flower


  1. I’m glad you have returned to solid ground as far as Brand is concerned! I own this and read it . . . and have completely forgotten it! A re-read is in order, but I might just wait for that rainy day . . . 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This was the second Brand novel I read, and I really enjoyed it — the imposible aspect is kinda weird (that dusty room, for one), but some of the charatcer-work is simply awesome. I think my favourite part is when Bella delivers that absolutely blistering monologue about why she shouldn’t be under suspicion for killing her husband to inherit the house…it’s just the most moving and wonderfully sharp piece of character-by-speech I think I’ve ever read.

    And that double-tap ending — woof! The revelation that occurs during the, erm, event is a piece of masterful reversal, and keeping an additional shock/reveal/whatever for the final line worked brilliantly as well. Definitely one of the more pleasing books I’ve read in a long time, not least becuase it made me understand why people kept going on about how good Brand was.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Interesting that you had reservations about the impossibility aspects as I often when reading these books I don’t have a locked room aficionado’s perspective on the locked room elements and not always sure how good they are. However I am definitely sure that the ending of this book is a masterpiece and the character work amongst the suspects is top rate.


      • Maybe it’s my natural caution at being considered knowledgable about anything to a meaningful degree, but I don’t think one needs to be an aficionado to appreciate, for example, the impossible crime element of such books. If you find the situation intersting and the answer enjoyable…what more is there? So long as you don’t find anything to question or dislike, you enjoyed it and therefore have a good perspective on it.

        The interaction of each individual reader with a book is far more important than what an apparent ‘expert’ thinks. I’m pretty sure this is why blogging is so popular, as we recognise the need for a variety of perspectives, and the days of being dictated to by professional reviewers who know what’s ‘good’ are well and truly gone. I’d much rather have your thoughts, or those of Brad or John Norris or Sergio or Noah or…well, pretty much everyone whose blog I follow, on something than that of a newpapers reviewer who doesn’t know the genre, or is always up against it to get our a snappy cover-bait soundbite and make sure the publisher/author is kept happy so they get an interview in the Saturday supplement.

        But, then, I am a very cynical man…

        Liked by 1 person

        • No I get what you’re saying. I just think sometimes because I am not a locked room aficionado I might be seeing something when I read such mysteries so just like to touch base with people who are. Doing so won’t change whether I liked the book or not, as Rupert Penny will attest to. But like you I am rather dubious of newspaper/ professional reviewers whenever I see them on books and online etc.


  3. I re-read this one recently, and enjoyed it very much – I was looking for the inquest scene where they wonder if weapon or poison could be hidden in a bathing suit. I think it’s one I could read every few years, a really good read with great details of its time.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Glad you enjoyed this novel. 🙂 Of all the Brand titles I’ve read, this struck me as the least memorable even though I couldn’t solve it – I can just about remember the culprit(s) and the solution to the locked room, but not much more. In contrast, I could guess key aspects of the solution to ‘Fog of Doubt’ and ‘Tour de Force’, but my impression was that they had more colour.

    Nevertheless, like JJ, I enjoyed the second wife’s monologue as to why she had not just no reason to kill for the house, but had sufficient reason to not do so.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.