A Cornucopia of Conundrums in The Bishop’s Sword (1948) by Norman Berrow

Source: Review Copy (Ramble House)

Vintage Mystery Scavenger Hunt Item: Policeman

The Bishop's Sword

The Bishop’s Sword (1948) is another book choice inspired by JJ at The Invisible Event and definitely gives value for money for the number of locked room/impossible crimes/scenarios it includes. The book takes place in and around a country town called Winchingham and the story’s setup has a range of familiar and unfamiliar characters. There is the new young companion-secretary, Toni Meridew who has come to work for the elderly Mrs Miriam Pendlebury. The latter was definitely a character I enjoyed as she is not the typical tyrannical parent and is actually quite humorous. Within this household there is also Miriam’s son Eric and sister, Emmeline Forbes, the last being interested in mysticism. Eric immediately seems very taken by Toni and this attraction becomes a source of comedy for the reader, as Miriam rebukes him mildly for it: ‘Don’t stare at Miss Meridew like that!’ Nearby there is also a mystery man, a mystic called Matthew Strange and his 6 Chinese followers, who are busy working on preparing a cave for their leader. Although Matthew is described as sometimes wearing flowing robes, it is interesting to note that he is also said to have ‘looked like a cross between a retired banker and an absent minded professor.’ Miriam’s home houses two valuable items, an expensive pearl necklace and a family sword which was:

‘sheathed in a red velvet scabbard decorated with gold filigree and thickly encrusted with either real or imitation jewels. The wide, curving hand guard was also apparently of gold and studded with more jewels, and about the hand-grip was more red velvet worn and stained by the clutch of dead and gone fingers…’

It’s not surprising that Toni finds this ‘an incongruous object… [for a] household of women.’ The sword also has an interesting backstory, having been gained by an ancestor who was a priest turned pirate. The sword is supposed to be impossible to steal due to the difficulty of selling it on and also due to practical reasons surrounding the cabinet it is in.

Yet life does not remain tranquil at Mrs Pendlebury’s with there apparently being an intruder in the garden and house at night, the latter of which seems to have disappeared out of a sealed room. But due to the house proud Forbes and the conscientious gardener any potential prints are removed. It is only a few nights later that there is anything to investigate, which is not surprising considering Miriam’s pearls are stolen and the gardener is found murdered with a blunt instrument. An early suspect for the police is Strange, which is to be expected when there is so much circumstantial evidence against, including the fact the pearls were found in his pocket. In itself this seems a fairly open and shut case for DI Smith, but when Strange claims in court that through projecting his psyche he will visit the magistrate events turn towards the bizarre, especially when it seems that he has done just that, while the police swear that he was locked in a police cell. What is more disturbing is that he is able to repeat this action and bring disturbing news each time, including another theft at the Pendlebury’s…

Is Strange the genuine thing or a phoney? Have the police got the wrong man after all? Will DI Smith and his cohorts reach the solution in time? The solving of this case takes a lot of brain power from DI Smith, breaking down the multiple layers of illusion and assumptions which have been built up around the case. Moreover, there is another perhaps even more fantastical act which I haven’t mentioned but cranked up mine and DI Smith’s befuddlement immensely.

With such confusing events coming up with a credible solution was always going to be no easy task and overall I think Berrow handled this area well, devising an interesting solution which did not make the explanation of the crime dry and overly detailed. However, I do think there is one element of the solution which feels a little bit like a cheat or perhaps a fairer way of putting it would be that the element was convenient. Although on the other hand I do realise that this element needed to be incorporated to explain away the most peculiar aspects of the case.

The narrative style for a locked room/ impossible crime novel where the mechanics of the crimes are given higher priority, was good and didn’t become too technical. However I think one area which could have been developed concerns the characters, as the ending of the novel did terminate rather abruptly and could have benefited from a rounding off or up of the characters. Moreover, I think although Berrow sets up a number of characters at the start of the story, he tends to ignore, overlook or possibly even forget some of them as the story progresses, focusing on a much smaller group. Consequently I think the relationships between the characters could have been developed/ included more. DI Smith though is a likeable and engaging detective character and it is enjoyable watching him work his way through the investigation, tackling events which are fairly mind boggling.

Rating: 4/5

See also:

JJ at The Invisible EventThe Bishop’s Sword

Advertisements

About armchairreviewer

Qualified English teacher, with a passion for literature and crime fiction. On a random note I also own pygmy goats and chickens with afros (it doesn't get any cooler than that).
This entry was posted in In the dock and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to A Cornucopia of Conundrums in The Bishop’s Sword (1948) by Norman Berrow

  1. JJ says:

    I’m delighted you enjoyed this; I was so excited when it turned out to be as much fun as it is, and it’s great the people are picking it up and a) disocvering how good Norman Berrow is and b) suporting Ramble House in their endeavours.

    The Footprints of Satan (which, ahem, (I reviewed earlier this year, back when the going was good) is a direct sequel to this in that it also involves Smith and the sisters Pendlebury – though obviously the events hereinhave no direct bearing on that one. But it is absolutely wonderful, one of the most delightfully intriguing and deceptively simple books I’ve read in a long, long time.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Did Berrow write more than those two books? Like you I enjoyed how the solution was not overly complicated in this novel but was still quite sneaky in a number of respects. Have you got out of your reading funk yet? (Suppose I may well find out tomorrow when your review on MOAL goes up). Also I’ve been meaning to ask are you going to contribute a post or two for TNBs this month as we are looking at Carr? Sure the people in the GA Detection FB group will be thrilled if you did, as in fact one member wondered why someone with such a great blog wasn’t in our group. Me and Brad explained your aversion to FB but both of us wouldn’t mind pasting in a link to the group of any TNB post you did. *end of sales pitch*

      Like

  2. Santosh Iyer says:

    Berrow wrote 20 novels of which 5 feature Inspector Smith. All 20 novels have been reprinted by Ramble house. The ebook versions of all 20 novels are available at Lulu.com

    Liked by 1 person

    • Wow that is a lot. Didn’t expect as many as that. And as always thank you Santosh for the info. I imagine your brain to be just one giant library full of detective and mystery novels. You would be an excellent contestant on Master Mind.

      Like

  3. Pingback: Book of the Month: February 2016 | crossexaminingcrime

  4. Pingback: An Initial Look at Crime and Detective Stories Magazine Issue 72 | crossexaminingcrime

  5. Pingback: Vintage Mystery Scavenger Hunt 2016: Wrap Up Post | crossexaminingcrime

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s